Revision and Updates of the Australian Allied Health Classification
System
The NRS Steering Committee emphasises that this is the first version
of a complex and challenging product - the development of a standardised
national classification system across ten professions! The current
version has many limitations and, with national implementation,
there will be a need for further review, development and validation.
NAHCC will be constantly monitoring the implementation and application
of the Australian Allied Health Classification System. The system
will be revised periodically according to the experiences and feedback
from the users and in response to changes in the broader health
care environment .
The National Allied Health Casemix Committee is currently working
on accessing resources for producing Version 2 of the Australian
Allied Health Classification System. Comments and suggestions on
Version 1 are welcomed; please forward these to the NAHCC Executive
Officer (see back page for contact details).
Indicators for Intervention
A clear finding of both the reference standards project and the
experience of many allied health professionals, was that allied
health activities often correlate poorly with the medical diagnosis.
One of the new variables forming part of the minimum data item set
is Indicator for Intervention (IFI) which is the allied health professionals
diagnosis code. There is, as yet, no classification system for IFI,
but allowance should be made for it when designing fields for activity
recording systems.
NAHCC is addressing the development of IFIs in its two-year strategic
plan and hopes to have IFI included in a subsequent version of the
Australian Allied Health Classification System.
Development of National Allied Health Service Weights
Once the National Allied Health Activity Classification and Minimum
Data Set have been in operation for an extended period of time across
multiple settings and disciplines, there will be a strong data base
that could be applied to the development of allied health service
weights. This would need to be considered in relation to future
directions established by the Commonwealth Casemix Development Plan.
Benchmarking
Having a solid information base on the role that allied health
plays in health care will be valuable for benchmarking and could
be used as a base for further research into allied health outcome
measures.
Australian data will also end the practice of using the generally
less appropriate U.S. allied health staff ratios and service weights
for the Australian setting.
Coding
From July 1 1998, the seven digit Generalised Allied Health Intervention
codes (see page 2 in the second section of this document) will be
used by Health Information Managers and coding staff to code allied
health activities - forming part of the procedures listing in the
national morbidity data set.
At this stage, the IPA and NIPA classifications will not be coded
as part of this dataset but will be valuable for departmental management
activities, national classification and costing studies (eg Developmental
Ambulatory Classification System - DACS) and for allied health research
activities..
Software Development
NAHCC is working on specifications for software packages that may
be used to collect and collate data. These will then be used to
evaluate the capacity of existing commercially available software
to satisfactorily achieve this task. These specifications, which
are utilising the Australian Allied Health Classification System,
are expected to be released in late 1997.
Replacement of the occasion of service statistic with patient
attributable activity
Occasions of service is a statistic used by many health services
around the country and is defined in the National Health Data Dictionary.
The value of this measure was examined by the NRS project but was
not incorporated into the minimum data set because it was not a
good indicator of:
- illness severity or complexity of the client
- resource utilisation
- workload / input of the staff.
NAHCC is working to have occasions of service replaced by a more
meaningful Clinical Care statistic.

|